Recent KSR Evidence critical appraisals

  • 1

    Comparison of effects of seven treatment methods for distal radius fracture on minimizing complex regional pain syndrome

    Wang, J. H. ; Sun, T.

    Risk of Bias Assessment: High

    A restriction to the Chinese and English language means that some relevant studies may have been missed. The search terms were reported, but full details of the search strategy were not reported. No information was provided regarding the number of authors involved in the study selection process.

    Bottom line The current evidence indicates that bridging external fixation, K-wire fixation, dorsal plating, volar plating, dorsal and volar plating, plaster fixation and non-bridging external fixation can have no marked difference in risk of complex regional pain syndrome in distal radius fracture patients. A restriction to the Chinese and English language means that some relevant studies may have been missed. The search terms were reported, but full details of the search strategy were not reported. No information was provided regarding the number of authors involved in the study selection process.

    Arch Med Sci 2017;13(1);163-73

  • 2

    Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation

    Li, X. ; Hu, Z. ; Cui, J. ; Han, Y. ; Pan, J. ; Yang, M. ; Tan, J. ; Sun, G. ; Li, L.

    Risk of Bias Assessment: Unclear

    Search terms were provided but a full search strategy was not reported, therefore it was not possible to judge if all relevant studies had been retrieved.

    Bottom line The evidence indicated that operative time, blood loss and complication rates were significantly reduced with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation in comparison with open lumbar microdiscectomy. Whereas, the difference between the treatment groups were similar in terms of pain reduction, global perceived effect (MacNab score), re-operation and recurrence rate. Hence, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy could be used as an alternative to the conventional procedure in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Search terms were provided, but a full search strategy was not reported, therefore it was not possible to judge if all relevant studies had been retrieved. Further high-quality randomised controlled trials were required to address the present review question.

    Int J Surg 2016;27();8-16

11–12 of 12 results, showing 10 | 20 | 50 results per page